(Click pic for more info...)	'Jim's Lists' - WARNING: AVOID THIS SCAM SITE!!	(Click pic for more info...)
	0 4 3 6 2 1

This treatise is perhaps one of the most important and significant critiques you are likely to read in relation to dating sites and introduction agencies as it serves as a very important warning against one of the Internet's biggest scammers – the nefarious cyber-spectre known merely as 'Jim'. We also examine the unseen dangers of believing unsupported hearsay and propaganda found on forum sites and sites that pretend to be authorities on 'Internet scamming'.

The contrived and criminal Internet scam network known as ‘Jim’s Lists’ alias jimslists.com; alias agencyscams.com; alias the unsavoury agency ‘EM’ (which pulls the strings on the whole faceless ‘Jim’ con) is an utter blight on the Internet landscape. It is an elaborately staged con that is fronted by a grubby and seedy cyber spectre referred to as ‘Jim’. It’s the kind of generic pseudonym you are most likely to find on the side of a garbage truck and it aptly suits the contrived and shadowy character and his murky, underhanded moneymaking network. In reality there is no ‘Jim’ per se. There are no pictures of him, no credentials on offer, no verification as to his real identity and no personal particulars available to prove his is anything other than a make believe figure. In fact, there is nothing tangible that can be used to tie any one person to the ‘Jim’ façade. This is not wanted or required by those involved. ‘Jim’ is a cunning puppet/tool used by the site network’s unseen backers in their obscene money making scam.

Unsuspecting men who visit ‘Jim’s’ site are spoon fed lies, hearsay and propaganda in a bid to hoodwink them

The con’s pretence is slick and slimy, like the foul-mouthed ‘Jim’ himself. Jim’s site, so the propaganda goes, is there to warn unsuspecting men of female scammers who work through Internet web sites – primarily dating agencies - to con men out of money. That’s the sugar coated lie to get men interested. What the site is really about, however, is making dirty dollars by using the scam exposing pretence as a drawcard or carrot. Unsuspecting men start to gravitate to Jim’s Lists in the hope of being given honest advice, Unfortunately, what they are spoon fed are lies, hearsay and propaganda in a bid to hoodwink them by gaining their confidence and manipulating their thinking through lies, falsehoods and slander. The lady scam reports are the carrots. Once Jim gets a nibble, he refers his followers to his preferred agency lists. Here lies the main thrust of Jim’s criminal con and his main source of his income. Agencies pay bribe money to Jim for recommendations in order to get new business from his site and then, in turn, make money from those who come to the recommended sites having been suckered by Jim’s lies and propaganda. ‘Jim’ makes his filthy lucre by charging seedy agencies money to be on his preferred lists. Agencies that refuse to align themselves with Jim and give him money are criticized by Jim and blacklisted though hearsay, unfounded accusations, lies and slander. It is hoped, by those involved, that the negative propaganda further directs new business towards his paid supporters. Graft is rife. The crims make money and the honest agencies are left with a black eye. Of course, behind it all, hiding in the shadows, are those pulling the strings. To find them, one only needs to look to the very top of Jim’s preferred agencies list. They are there, but remain overlooked. They are like the pea in the old shell game con. They are never where you expect them to be once the shells have been shuffled.

For further in-depth information, please read our treatise entitled, ‘Who Anti-Scams The Anti-Scammers?’, which serves to expose the elaborate con known as 'Jim's Lists', and discuss the dangers of taking the word of grubby cyber spectres and self-appointed 'authorities' like 'Jim' seriously and at face value.

WARNING: 'Jim's Lists' is one of the biggest scams on the Internet and should under no circumstance be trusted or believed.

We've all, at one time or another, been given cause to question the honesty and integrity of those select individuals in the social hierarchy who occupy positions of authority or 'higher' authority. The 'authority figure' is someone we are indoctrinated to accept as a symbol of virtue, something sort of like Superman, but this time with the underwear worn well and truly on the inside. The indoctrination process is so successful that we accept – and all too blindly – anyone touted as being an 'authority'. With cobalt blue underwear that was once widely recognisable no longer on public display, it is difficult for anyone to see a large letter 'S' on a huge and pouting chest anymore. So, recognising a legitimate hero-saviour amidst a crowd of drably dressed 'wannabes' is not an easy task.

To help us we have our great and glorious elected officials offering 'authority' jobs to those who satisfy the related requirements, whatever they may be. No-one seems to know for sure, save those that do the hiring.

Kite-makers, window dressers, golfers, greengrocers...just about anyone can be an authority on something. However, it's those that are 'in' authority, such as judges, police, bailiffs and so forth that appear less as authorities in a practical 'greengrocer' sense and more as the well-concealed belligerent right arm of Authority itself. The difference between authority being in someone and someone being in authority is the amount of power delegated to the authoritarian figure and in what ways they in turn use this power to enact their authoritarian presence.

Not to be confused with those whose experience, knowledge and intelligence make them the obvious choice to be the vanguard of hope for a better tomorrow by treating 'authoritarian principles' with the contempt they so rightly deserve, we have, on the other hand, those who have been 'given the nod' – the Echelon, for want of a better term. Those in the Echelon have all been legitimized by the Powers That Be as having met the requirements set down by the Powers That Be to the greater glory and betterment of the Powers That Be. And so say all of us!

Professional 'authority figures', having been legitimized with a widey recognised stamp of social approval, and in possession of the necessary personal qualities, whatever these might be, to rise above all others in accepted standards of personal virtue, are expected to play their part exactly as it has been scripted – no ad-libbing or plot deviation will be allowed or tolerated. They do what they are told by those who tell them what to do. When all is said and done, theirs is the brand of authority that is condoned and that carries a stick – usually a big one. It's a stick that when placed in the wrong pair of hands, can leave quite a sizeable welt on the spirit and resilience of those who are prone to offer even the slightest modicum of resistance.

Acting the part also means dressing the part. No long, flowing cape or customized utility belt is to be found here. Standout heroics are shunned; except when nobody is around to see. That's where the stick comes in. Anonymity is customary. It's how to be a part of the whole without being a whole part. That's the way the Powers That Be like it and that's the way the Powers That Be want it to remain. Conformity is good for business. A happy customer is as good as money in the bank. And so say all of us!

We are told to hold the 'authority figure' in some form of high esteem, though the reasons why we must is really never fully explained to us. It seems that by being an unwitting part of the collective whole, we're subjugated to lick the authoritarian boot that can, when it is so designated by the Powers That Be, kick us. It's just accepted like so many other things. If we didn't, the wheels of 'Justice' as we know them would grind to a halt. It's something quite unthinkable - and very bad for business.

With everybody wanting to believe and straining their neck to catch sight of a hero that will deliver them from the clutches of the villains in amongst us all, still nobody has, as yet, come-up with the magic formula that will allow us to differentiate between who amongst us is actually on our side fighting for truth, justice and all that sort of thing, and who is out only for themselves; a profiteer. Where is that fella in the red and blue tights or the lady with the golden lasso when we really need them? I guess trying to spot them is like trying to explain the overall difference between the light-play of dusk and dawn.

Can a costume be a uniform or is a uniform really a costume? Because we are so quick to accept the authority figure on face value - because that's the accepted norm - we tend to lose any impetus to ask who, what, where, when and why; the most important question here, of course, being 'Why?'

Does the appointed 'authority figure' deserve our acceptance, if at all? If so, why? Just because someone is dressed like judge; does that make him a judge and worthy of passing sentence without fear of reproach? Just because a thespian acts in the same manner as a brain surgeon on stage or screen, does that give him the knowledge and skills to really operate or is it all just a part of the show? Just because someone proclaims himself to be an 'authority', has the outward appearance of being an 'authority' and who carries a stick like someone in 'authority', do we automatically take it for granted that he is an 'authority'? Is the benefit of the doubt something that should be given without any scrutiny whatsoever or should the doubt be a benefit that is given freely, but not taken lightly?

The Internet is seen as many things to many people. It both reinterprets and reinvents its origins without fear of disapproval from anyone. The intrinsic nature of the cyber world has many parallels to the real world. However, in one respect it differs – and significantly. The politics of the Internet never have, and probably never will, serve to delegate authority; in cyberspace authority is something that is self-proclaimed, self-appointed and self-answerable. In cyberspace you don't need someone to bestow on you black robes and a powder wig. You don't need someone to hand you a soiled tin badge and a grimy pair of handcuffs. You don't need someone to issue you khakis and a hand grenade. All you need is a big stick, someone to hit and someone nearby to watch it all happen. And so say all of us!

On the Internet, credentials don't mean a thing. Comparatively, they're about as relevant in cyberspace as having an IQ. The 'Power To Be' rather than the 'Powers That Be', is that by which authority is delegated. Unlike the real world, in the cyber world everybody is largely on their own to act according to their own devices. It is a unique opportunity to be oneself - for better or for worse, for richer or poorer and so on and so forth. However, we can appear to drift all alone on a sea of fiberoptic particles and, unbeknownst to ourselves, still be part of the human condition and social conditioning of the real world. The compulsion to cow-tow to accepted norms is a shackle that is hard to break free of, even in cyberspace. Our obedience and subservience to the customs of the real world forever work against us and allow our thoughts and our opinions to become coerced and subsequently enslaved in the same form of voluntary bondage as that found in the real world. We are bound so expertly that we continue to accept because we are told to, believe because we are told to and comply because we are told to.

In cyberspace, 'authority figures' are manufactured in much the same way as they are in the real world. For example, take someone or something, dress it up to be recognisable in some way, shape or form and then give it a big stick. Presto. Instant authority. You can also give it an arbitrary name such as Phil or Bob, even Jim.

Then, once you have your 'Jim' established, it's time to give him something to do with the stick, such as give those he determines to be 'undesirable' or a 'scammer' a good bashing in front of an unwitting Internet audience. His reasons for the bashing can be as justifiable as anything you might find in the real world. However, the reasons don't really matter or even need to be divulged to a mesmerized audience and conclave of Jim groupies; all of whom are entertained by the antics and wildly destructive mayhem on public display. Nobody really cares why. It's the bashing itself that takes centre stage and draws the most interest.

Jim 'McCarthy' he's not, but he could be. Jim's brand of witch-hunting and stick bashing isn't at all new. It doesn't matter who invented it. It has a purpose and it works, that's all that is important. It's an old ploy and an effective ploy.

Not forgetting that heroes are in short supply in this or any other world, lets make Jim's facade appear to one and all as an honest and forthright protector of people everywhere – at no cost to anyone. It really doesn't matter who pays for Jim's set-up as long as it isn't us. Right? How wonderful. It seems to me that Jim's apparent philanthropic penchant for 'do-gooding' for free has all the hallmarks of a Batmanesque benefactor who exists only to serve the forces of justice and niceness. It is said that imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. So what if Jim is the spitting image of Batman or Superman or even John Dillinger; another celebrated hero-type that sits alongside the likes of Billy the Kid, Alex from A Clockwork Orange and Ned Kelly. These were all thought to be great guys once and certainly legends of a similar sort. But why knock a gift horse like Jim? He's supposed to be on our side and in our corner, at least that's what his own publicity suggests. I say it's wonderful that this modest cyberspace Lone Ranger prefers to do all his good deeds and crime fighting behind a mask or with a cowl plonked on top of his head. In a sense, it isn't all that important to really know who the masked marvel is that is helping us so freely, that is as long as he keeps on doing it gratis. Right? I mean he does it, doesn't he? Right? And out of the goodness of his heart. Right? Right? And he does it with money out of his own pocket. Right? Right? There is no ulterior motive behind his actions. Right? Right? Right? Money never comes into it. This is cyberspace remember. Yeah, right!

Isn't it marvellous that we can suspend our doubt so much and to such a degree that we can ignore Jim's true identity, where he comes from, what he does to earn a crust, what he really looks like in the broad light of day without a mask or a dark coloured cowl to obscure his features, where he gets the money to fund such an operation and where he can find the time to do all of this whilst everyone else is out breaking their backs trying to make ends meet. Why wouldn't anyone want to hero worship such a sterling character like Jim?

Hey, wait a tick...Now that you mention it, someone could ask, who is Jim really and why would he want to do something for nothing? Where does it get him? Does he have a screw loose somewhere? Who in their right mind would want to spend their days and nights chained to a computer just waiting to expose a meagre handful of alleged dating site scammers and the agencies that allegedly endorse them? Also, in recognition of his selfless achievements, why doesn't he want everyone to know his true identity so they can say to his parents what a wonderful character he is for helping everybody for free? Also, by knowing his address they could go and give him a big, brass medal to wear on his chest; that is assuming he has a chest to put it on. Come to think of it, no-one has ever seen pictures of Jim, which doesn't come as much of a surprise in view of his preference for anonymity.

Hey, wait another tick...could that then mean that somehow, maybe, Jim might not be real flesh and blood? Unthinkable! Could it be that perhaps Jim is only a figment of someone's crooked imagination and concocted so as to dupe one and all into believing what he says is true and not a prefabricated lie? Perish the thought!

Hey, just a moment...could Jim really be little more than a cleverly contrived cyber tool used by a faceless company - perhaps a dating agency with a squeaky clean image that toots its own horn about being better than everyone else - to discredit other dating agencies (business competitors) whose honest business practices have the potential to draw clientele - and most importantly revenue - away from the faceless company? No, never in a million years! It's not about money...or is it? Don't they say that money makes the world go 'round? Why then should cyberspace be any different?

Hey...maybe this squeaky-clean company isn't so honest as it makes out. Maybe they use a cyber spectre like Jim to draw suspicion away from themselves. Instead maybe they use Jim to 'point the bone' at the Competition. With the Competition discredited, Jim's faithful followers - all firm, dedicated, hard-core believers – take in every shovelful of slop this self-proclaimed and self-righteous mouthpiece tosses their way. Whatever Jim says, goes – and so does the money. It goes to fill the coffers of the faceless company. As far as slick operations go, this is a real beaut. With a front man like Jim that is all shadow and no substance, the faceless company's tracks are very well covered. Even the most seasoned bloodhound would have a hard time exposing the corruption behind Jim's elaborate and extensive con.

Wow, having said this, wouldn't someone be an absolute fool to believe such a faceless nobody as Jim and his disreputable conduct simply on face or faceless value? The answer is a firm YES! But then when a con is so slick and well organized, people can be tricked very easily. That's how a 'confidence trickster' works. You believe because you want to. Truth, fairness, honesty and justice don't ever come into it. At the root of all cons is money and Jim's con is no different. It's a big money spinner for the faceless company and all its cohorts it gets money from to get Jim's approval and move-up on his acceptability list. At the very top of the list, no surprise to anyone, sits, of course, the faceless company - no longer faceless, just very well disguised. It's virtue is assured as who would ever believe that someone who Jim touts as being #1 could ever be involved in such shady, corrupt dealings as Internet stick bashing? The irony is both delicious and pathetic. A nod from Jim pays off in a very big way ($$$). So, if you are a competitor, why make waves? Instead, why not just be a significant part of the cash flow? Why even try to beat them if joining them is a more lucrative option? A little graft can go a long way in Jim's moneymaking operation.

However, not everyone has the same yellow streak down their back as Jim does, not to mention Jim's backers and all their cohorts. There are those that resist and just like in the real world, they get bashed for it. As Jim's infantile philosophy embraces the banal belief that not being part of the solution immediately makes you part of the problem, so too it serves to reinforce the fact that Jim's hypocrisy knows no limits. What the real problem actually is and what the necessary solution needs to be gets smoke-screened by Jim. It is in fact Jim who is the problem and the solution is nothing short of his mandatory castration (in a figurative sense) and the destruction of his ludicrous list and his ability to influence the confidence potential clients have in service providers whose only real crime is to offer services that are in competition with the faceless company responsible for Jim's creation and his on-going destructive handiwork. As an authority on anti-scamming, Jim is nothing short of a being a full-on joke - and an unfunny one at that. However, as an expert on scamming, Jim can truly be considered an 'authority'. His shady backers have seen to that.

What goes hand-in-hand with the power wielded by community endorsed 'authority figures' (whether of the real world or of cyberspace) is the potential for the abuse, exploitation and corruption of relative power. Jim is a perfect example of such abuse. It is a frightening prospect that such corruption and exploitation, seen often enough in the real world, has now spilled over into the technical universe at a very fundamental level. The acquisition of money is at the root of it as it is with most things.

There are many victims of Jim's on-going mayhem and madness and his destructive brand of chaos needs to be stopped. They are ways to do this. The best and most effective way is to drive him (and his whole entourage) from cyberspace with a bigger stick than the one he currently wields – and the sooner, the better. It is imperative that as many people as possible are made aware of the corruption embodied by Jim, as an unsavoury, destructive mouthpiece and the criminal business interests behind his presence that use the '4 Horsemen Approach' to slander the Competition and hijack their paying clientele. Boycott both Jim and the agency of scammers pulling his strings. In fact, do anything it takes to see that Jim and his silent partners no longer benefit financially from a confidence trick that unjustifiably brings into disrepute the reputation of legitimate agencies. In addition to this, take a moment or two to ask yourself a few brief questions. Ask yourself...who judges the judges? Who polices the police? Who reports on the reporter? Then pose the question, who anti-scams the anti-scammer? The most appropriate character to pose this question to is Jim, but don't be surprised if you fail to get a response. It's a question that he just doesn't have an answer for - and never will.

It is widely known in the trade that Jim's Lists is itself nothing more than a contrived scam, perhaps one of the biggest and most successful 'agency' scams on the Internet. Its sucker list of true believers is no less than 100 times longer than Jim's bogus scammer list.

There have been articles published on the Internet claiming to have definite proof that a dubious dating outfit known in some instances as EM was behind Jim's Lists and that EM attempted to squash the articles because they named names of individuals involved in the Jim's Lists scam. We can neither prove nor refute the claims made in the articles or on the Internet due to the con being so slick and covert, however we know where we stand on the matter and whom we know is indeed behind it all. If you are in doubt as to just who the culprit is, I'm sure it isn't hard to guess just which 'agency' appears at the very top of Jim's list of recommended service providers. The facts speak for themselves.

As HEAVENLY HEARTS isn't a boot-licker and refuses to participate in the Jim's Lists scam, in retaliation HH has had a trumped-up allegation made against us by a so-called ‘anonymous critic' on Jim's bogus site. No solid proof has ever been provided to support the allegation and no evidence whatsoever proving the allegation and who actually made the allegation has ever been forthcoming. At best, it's nothing more than contrived hearsay. So much for verifiable proof!

These are the facts regarding the allegation:

The allegation is an outright lie.

The so-called allegation never happened.

The accuser was never at any time a Member of HH. This we know as what was stated in the allegation was cross-referenced with our records and there was not a shred of supportive evidence found that could give any credence to the complaint.

(How many other competitors of the 'faceless company' has this also been done to? The answer is too many!)

The cyber-spectre 'Jim' never at any time contacted us. This is a lie.

We attempted to contact 'Jim' though his bogus site to refute the allegation. Our emails were never returned. We were not surprised as it was never their intention to remove us from this list. It is more profitable to slander us by suggesting impropriety on our part. False as the allegation is, it works in their favour.

Below are other questions we challenge you to find answers to (if you can). If you can get verifiable evidence pertaining to just one question, then you are doing better than anyone else ever has.

Who is Jim?

What is his full name?

Where does he live?

Where is his proof of identity?

What does he really look like?

What are his qualifications, if any?

Where does the money come from to finance his web site operation?

Who is really behind the Jim's List scam?

Why can't Jim be contacted by any means other than email (that is if he can be contacted at all)?

Who are the 'anonymous' spectres that make the complaints to Jim?

Where is the hard evidence to support the allegations made on Jim's lists or is hearsay all that is required to slander and condemn someone Jim takes a 'dislike' to?

You be the 'judge'. However, the facts speak for themselves!

P.S. Don't be surprised if Jim tries to make more heated accusations against us as no crook or crooked company likes to have their dirty laundry aired in public. Jim and his backers are no different to any common criminal in this respect.

[UPDATE]
January, 2010

WARNING: DON’T BE FOOLED OR CONNED BY THE JIM’S LISTS SCAM! BE AWARE OF THE FACT THAT IT USES SLANDER, HEARSAY & UNFOUNDED ALLEGATIONS TO ATTACK COMMERCIAL OPPOSITION TO THOSE WHO PAY MONEY TO BE PROMOTED BYTHE CRIMINAL NETWORK BEHIND THE WHOLE JIM’S LISTS SCAM.

The contrived and criminal Internet scam network known as ‘Jim’s Lists’ alias jimslists.com; alias agencyscams.com; alias the unsavoury agency ‘EM’ (which pulls the strings on the whole faceless Jim con), reacted exactly as expected to our written warning/treatise on their deplorable moneymaking ‘anti-scam’ web site swindle.

In retaliation to our efforts to bring their criminal antics to the attention of honest people everywhere, we were quickly demoted or promoted (or however you’d like to describe their petty action) to the ranks of the ‘Black’ List or THE List or whatever ridiculous euphemism they use. However, it really doesn’t matter what they call it as it is in essence nothing but a trite joke - and the joke is on all those who believe the trashy gossip-mongering they promote so expertly. We obviously hit a nerve somewhere. Understandably, no criminal network, especially the one behind the Jim’s Lists racket wants to have its dirty laundry aired in public. Public exposure serves to undermine the already highly suspect, dubious and murky reputation this fetid, corrupt con still clings to – which isn’t a whole lot.

Fundamentally, as far as those behind the Jim’s List scam goes, their credentials are non-existent, their tactics are dirty, their conduct is defamatory, their manner is slovenly, their motives are highly dubious and their ability to justify anything they say or do is a failure. In fact, surfing their web site has all the charm and appeal of walking through a second rate slum.

The foul, gutter-level utterances that emanate from the cyber mouth of ‘Jim’ are crude, offensive and deliberately critical. They reflect a sloppy, incoherent mentality that is incapable of intelligent thought or constructive/justifiable critique. They serve to defame and slander anyone who won’t pay them their graft so as to be listed on their ludicrous and laughable ‘Gold’ list.

**Fact: Jim’s Lists/agencyscams.com is a criminal con that extorts money from dating/marriage agencies. The way it works is that you either pay a basic amount of money to ‘Jim’ in order to avoid being blacklisted by unsupported hearsay and contrived lies on his scam site or you pay even more money and be promoted by ‘Jim’ as being recommended and worthy of being listed on his phoney Gold List. Either way – you pay.**

It’s a slick con and one thought up by the criminals behind the ‘EM’ moneymaking machine. At best, it’s a reprehensible piece of garbage that makes a total mockery of any honest effort to inform Internet users of individuals and organization on the Internet who are reported to have used unethical tactics to con others out of money and gratuities.

In any normal, socially accepted mode of conduct, unsupported accusations are considered as libel. However, not adhering to any standards of decency or propriety, the Jim’s List con uses only hearsay and unfounded criticism to unduly slander those it wishes to discredit – usually that equates to the commercial opposition of its backers.

**Fact: ‘Jim’ is a faceless puppet without any verifiable identity. When contacted by both HEAVENLY HEARTS and HEAVENLY HEARTS’ clients (i.e. by email as suspiciously there is no direct person contact available) in opposition to their unfounded slander and so as to refute the unsupported allegations displayed on ‘Jim’s’ shonky web site, the emails went unanswered and the correspondence went unpublished. So much for ‘Jim’s’ so-called honest reporting.**

Hearsay, unsupported allegations and anonymous critical comments are the weapons the Jim’s List con uses to attack all who don’t ‘pay the Piper’ (i.e. the Jim organization) the related (i.e. protection money).

**HEAVENLY HEARTS has a constant stream of clients coming to us from sites such as ‘EM’ because the aforesaid clients feel they have been conned and ripped-off by the disreputable conduct of web sites such as ‘EM’. They complain of unprofessional conduct and being duped by ladies in the very same manner that Jim falsely accuses other sites, including HEAVENLY HEARTS, of perpetrating. Strange that this never gets a mention on ‘Jim’s’ site, even after our clients complain to the cyber spectre ‘Jim’ about impropriety on the part of agencies listed on Jim’s Gold List. However, don’t expect ‘Jim’ to level criticism at one of his paying customers or else the gravy train for him stops**

**The reason ‘Jim’ can freely slander others and largely get away with it is that there is no direct live person to be held accountable for the unsupported defamation levelled as those who reuse to cow tow and be extorted by the Jim’s List scam. The ‘Jim’ puppeteers are scared of law suits citing libel against them so they have created a faceless façade, given it a generic name and made sure that there is no direct way of contacting anyone human – or sub-human - regarding the extreme acts of slander and misconduct perpetrated publicly on the Jim Lists network web sites.**

[NEW CRITIQUE]

Below is our latest critique on the slimy Jim’s List con. Our critique further exposes the corruption behind the use of the puppet figure and cyber spectre called ‘Jim’ as a means of making a dirty dollar from those who are conned into believing his contrived swill and web site propaganda. Since our previous treatise and in a bid to try and look respectable, ‘Jim’ published responses (such as they are) to the questions we posed about his inability to prove his identity and his corrupt involvement in the Jim’s List scam. He listed these responses on his dubious web site. However, we have included said responses within our critique. As you will no doubt see for yourself, the responses were little more than profane retorts that offered no verifiable proof whatsoever. We’ve named our new critique ‘‘Jim’ alias ‘Scammerman’. We hope it will once again prove both enlightening and informative.

‘Jim’ alias ‘Scammerman’ (A cyber-coward singeing under the spotlight of scrutiny)

Anybody involved in a public enterprise becomes a public figure and is therefore open to public scrutiny and accountability. Only someone who remains dubious and highly suspect like ‘Jim’ and his cohorts is pursued relentlessly by questions and demands to provide satisfactory proof of their honesty, integrity - and identity. ‘Jim’ has been hounded for years because no satisfactory explanation or proof has ever been forthcoming as to his real identity or his shady business and web site dealings. As far as criminalist con artists go, ‘Jim’ is up there with the worst of them – or should that be ‘down there’? In order to evade giving answers and verification of his own actual identity (such that it is), ‘Jim’ resorts to citing anonymous ‘civic duty’ or some such similar twaddle as his motivation. What rot! With all due respect to both Samuel Johnson and Ambrose Bierce who cite patriotism and democracy respectively as the last refuge of a scoundrel, in ‘Jim’s’ case it’s his benign and hypocritical cries of duty and social obligation that brand ‘Jim’ as the worst kind of scoundrel; the kind that a hides a criminal money-making scam enterprise behind the façade of a poorly educated cyber clod (who claims to sleep with his computer); one whose alter-ego acts like a poor man’s Batman - and with a slickly optimized web site for a pseudo-Batcave. Behind the cowl there is no Bruce Wayne, in actuality what is to be found is something more like a psychotic Joker; a conniving court jester who dances to the tune played by his unseen backers and EM cyber-crims. Unlike Bruce Wayne, ‘Jim’ doesn’t pay for his pseudo-superhero operation out of the goodness of his heart; that is because his sole interest is in making the dirtiest dollar he possibly can. How? The answer is by employing his corrupt gangster tactics of using his web site to intimidate others to join him under the umbrella of protection offered by his nefarious network. Of course, there’s a hefty fee to do this. ‘Protection money’ it used to be called. All who oppose get slandered. All who comply get promoted. At the top of the gold award list is the absolute worst of the ratbag element – those behind the entire dirty scam – EM and the female stooge that fronts the whole rotten and fetid operation.

’Jim’ the scoundrel never mentions how he actually makes his living. If the truth be known, what he, in fact, does for a job is absolutely nothing except act as foul-mouthed puppet spectre for the entire putrid operation. We’ve got to admit it’s a slick con. Not only does Jim rake in the graft from those that cow-tow to the pressure his protection racket exerts, but he also gets a sizeable tax-exempt income from offering advertising space on the walls of his bogus Batcave. On top of this, his destructive brand of negative propagandas and unsupported hearsay slams the criminal cartel’s business opposition and helps to drive the suckers – the true believers - into the arms of EM and the other dirty dealers. All the time the narcissistic EM boss is globetrotting in first class style somewhere sight unseen – and all on dirty ‘Jim’s Lists’ money.

It’s time for everyone to see the Jim’s List Scam for what it really is – a corrupt and criminal money-making enterprise!

‘Jim’s’ published responses to our demands for him to provide proof as to his true and verifiable identity, that is when they finally surfaced, were indeed both ludicrous and unacceptable. They provided no solid evidence and proved nothing – which was to be expected. ‘Jim’s’ best attribute is indeed his ability to be excessively evasive and extremely abusive. When ‘Jim’ is backed into a corner – and this is whenever he is asked to prove himself, his identity and his bogus claims – he resorts to slander, unfounded criticism and abusive remarks. It never fails. The archetypal scoundrel will always hide behind the cowl of false propriety and for a phoney character like ‘Jim’, he is better-off portraying ‘Scammerman’ rather than Batman. He is also better-off staying on the shady side of the law because he would never be able to pass the lie detector test if his true identity was ever divulged – not that there is anything to divulge, mind you. How can you divulge something that doesn’t exist in the first place?

We invite you to peruse the responses made by ‘Scammerman’. If they weren’t so pathetic, they would be laughable. Sadly, it’s not a laughing matter. Criminal behaviour never is…

Jim's initial response to our demand for the truth…

I am not going to (yet again) explain myself or my site. I have been doing it for 10 years. There are 2 links on my homepage that explain everything. (Who is Jim? Who are Jim's critics?) Everything in this article above is crap that he read on the net. Things posted by dream-marriage.com (posing as agencyscams.net). And those things were read by dream-marriage on old forums. Notice, that nobody has any proof of anything. Everyone who knows my site knows that I change agencies and lists to deal with the times. I remove agencies from all lists and move them to other lists. Anyway, he never contacted me to clear up the problems at his site, that proves that he knows I am right.

I will answer his final questions, because, yet again, like I did with agencyscams.net, he thinks his questions prove something, but my answers prove that he is retarded and has no basis of anything...

Below are the actual questions we challenged ‘Jim’ to provide verifiable evidence for. As we expected, the responses are themselves total hearsay, just like the rest of ‘Jim’s’ unfounded accusations and contrived comments.

Our Question: 1. Who is Jim?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: Where’s the proof? ‘Jim’ needs to answer this question by giving some form of solid evidence as to who he is in a verifiable way. His answer is absolutely worthless as it says nothing and proves nothing about this real identity of this faceless cyber clown. It provides no tangible evidence whatsoever as to who is really pulling the strings on this vile criminal puppet.

Our Question: 2. What is his full name?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: Again ‘Jim’s’ answer is as worthless as everything else about his shady web site enterprise as it proves nothing and gives no verifiable supportive evidence about this faceless cyber spectre. Where’s the proof, Jim? Yet again we are supposed to take this faceless nobody at his word and on ‘faceless’ value. Why should we? It is the worthless word of an unverifiable nobody. Hearsay and unsupported assertion is the hallmark of this slimy con artist and should be shown the contempt such bogus assertions deserve.

Our Question: 3. Where does he live?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Where’s the proof, ‘Jim’? Again this murky nobody evades the question. Why is it so important for ‘Jim’ not to be accountable to those he accuses, the authorities or common decency? He considers himself outside the realm of society and above accountability merely by virtue of the lies and accusations he perpetuates. What have you got to hide, ‘Jim’?

Our Question: 4. Where is his proof of identity?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: This slimy reprobate yet again dodges the issue and refuses to answer the question. If ‘Jim’ or anybody makes accusations, then they should be prepared to stand up like a man – if they are ‘man’ (in ‘Jim’s’ case this is definitely not the case) - and be willing to be held accountable for their actions and comments in an honest open way. Such a gutless façade is Jim that ‘he’ is in essence an intangible reflection of the corruption and criminal intent of the profiteering puppet masters pulling the strings behind the whole dirty ‘Jim’ masquerade. ‘Jim’s’ business is dirty business. ‘He’ (in the form of the shady operators behind him) is making money through the multitude of ‘make believe’ allegations against the business competition of his profiteering backers.

Our Question: 5. What does he really look like?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: This is a typical ‘Jim’ answer. In other words, it is no answer. If ‘Jim’ is so community conscious and quick to shoot his mouth off, he should be prepared to let those he accuses see what he really looks like. What are you afraid of, ‘Jim’? Why are you too gutless to accuse someone to their face instead of attempting to stab them in the back with your lies and hearsay? ‘Jim’ can’t provide the proof because there is no proof to provide. WHY SHOULD ANYONE BELIEVE ANYTHING THIS FACELESS NOBODY SAYS? THE ANSWER IS, THEY SHOULDN’T. ‘JIM’S’ WORDS ARE CHEAP; ESPECIALLY AS HE ISN’T PREPARED TO BACK THEM UP WITH HIS REAL IDENTITY – OR THAT OF HIS SHADY BACKERS.

Our Question: 6. What are his qualifications, if any?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: The question obviously asks ‘Jim’ to verify by what approval, credentials, justification or recognisable governing authority does ‘he’ consider himself qualified enough to give any sort of acceptable opinion on anything whatsoever, especially ‘anti-scamming’?

’Jim’ probably has been ‘operating for 19 years in one form or another; once a criminal, always a criminal. ‘Jim’ has no credentials, authority, approval or justification for being qualified to do anything except defame others in an anonymous way, purely for reasons of commercial profit.

‘Jim’ says he has a B.A. Really? What do these letters stand for ‘Jim’, ‘Bogus Authority’? In what discipline did you study and from which accredited institute did you graduate? If he really did have some legitimate, tertiary qualifications then it really should assist him in being able to write, spell and punctuate properly. Real tertiary qualifications should also assist him in being able to structure an argument instead of resorting to base profanity and banal retorts when making a simple response. You see…someone in ‘Jim’s’ position does not need an education to do what he does. All he needs is a web site, hearsay and a gullible audience. WAKE UP PEOPLE! ‘JIM’ & HIS SHADOWY BACKERS ARE LAUGHING ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK AT EVERYONE’S EXPENSE. SEE THEIR CONTRIVED CON FOR WHAT IT REALLY IS – A BOGUS, MONEY-MAKING SCAM.

Our Question: 7. Where does the money come from to finance his web site operation?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: Once again Jim resorts to vulgar insults – not constructive argument – to get his hearsay evidence across. And for the very first time ever ‘Jim’ says something that can be supported – he has banner advertising. According to ‘Jim’, his costs total $175 per year (again unverified hearsay). What ‘Jim’ doesn’t tell us is how much he makes from the extortion, protection money, kickbacks, blackmailing and defamation his seedy web site activities rake in for his backers. You can bet that it is all tax-exempt. Gangster money usually is.

Our Question: 8. Who is really behind the Jim's List scam?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: How dreary and a typical response that in no way helps to support ‘Jim’s’ credibility (that is, if there was any credibility – which there isn’t). I suppose when you have no credibility whatsoever, it is difficult to generate some; unless it’s by hearsay (something Jim is infamous for).

Our Question: 9. Why can't ‘Jim’ be contacted by any means other than email (that is if he can be contacted at all)?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: Again the tired pattern of refusing to answer the question and refusing to provide concrete evidence, also resorting to insults and jibes continues. ‘Jim’ can’t afford to be contacted in person because the identity of the backers behind ‘Jim’ is smoke screened by the old ‘email only’ dodge. Anytime an Internet presence wants to hide or avoid direct contact, they refuse to provide anything but email contact. No direct contact means that they have something to hide. In ‘Jim’s’ case, direct contact means exposure for the whole sordid con and the backers behind it. Prison time for defamation, fraud, corruption and many other associated crimes is something these criminals want to avoid. ANYONE - OR, AS IN ‘JIM’S’ CASE, ANYTHING - THAT CAN’T BE DIRECTLY CONTACTED IN A REAL PERSON TO REAL PERSON WAY SHOULD IMMDIATELY BECOME SUSPECT. ‘JIM’ IS HIGHLY SUSPECT & SHOULD BE MADE TO ACCOUNT FOR HIS CRIMES. HOWEVER, BRINGING CRIMS TO JUSTICE IS DIFFICULT IN CYBERPACE WORLD DEVOID OF ACCOUNTABILITY – SOMETHING WE CAN THANK THE SEARCH ENGINE CONGLOMERATES FOR.

Our Question: 10. Who are the 'anonymous' spectres that make the complaints to Jim?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: What a load of codswallop, ‘Jim’. It’s a convenient cop-out for a slimy back-door trader. In any civilized social set-up, the accused is entitled to know the true identity of his accuser. In ‘Jim’s world, however, culpability is non-existent. Nobody has to prove what they say. They can make any unfounded criticism or slanderous remark they like – as long as the remark works in the best interest of his backers’ criminal enterprises. Many is the time that our clients who are continuously offended at the way ‘Jim’ flagrantly proliferates hearsay and slander via his web site network that the have written to ‘Jim’s’ only form of contact – his email address - and complained of his tactics and failure to accurately publish the testimonies of the multitude of Internet users who recommend HEAVENLY HEARTS as an honest and highly professional agency. As was to be expected, Jim completely ignored the correspondence and refused to publish said positive comments. WHY? BECAUSE JIM IS NOT PREPARED TO SAY ANYTHING GOOD ABOUT HIS BACKERS’ BUSINESS OPPOSITION. HIS SITE WAS CREATED TO DEFAME OTHERS –WHICH IT DOES. IT ONLY PROMOTES THOSE WHO PAY HIM GRAFT MONEY. IT’S THAT SIMPLE.

HOW CAN JIM IGNORE HEAVENLY HEARTS’ CLIENT TESTIMONIES? THE ANSWER IS HE CAN’T IGNORE THEM – HOWEVER HE REFUSES TO ACKNOWLEDE THEM OTHERWISE HIS WHOLE CORRUPT HOUSE OF CARDS WOULD COME CRASHING DOWN & WITH IT THE DIRTY MONEY HIS CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION DEPENDS UPON.

HEAVENLY HEARTS’ CLIENT TESTIMONIES: http://www.heavenlyhearts.net/tour/romance_tours.html

Our Question: 11. Where is the hard evidence to support the allegations made on Jim's lists or is hearsay all that is required to slander and condemn someone Jim takes a 'dislike' to?

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: Once again Jim’s talk is cheap. Seeing is believing! Jim fails to provide even a single shred of tangible evidence to support his slanderous hearsay and mucky allegations. WHY SHOULD JIM BE BELIEVED??? THE ANSWER IS THAT HE SHOULDN’T. He has no right to be taken seriously especially when he hides behind his ‘Scammerman’ cowling and hurls criticism at those who are accountable and can provide verifiable proof. HEAVENLY HEARTS stands behind its reputation. The personnel at HEAVENLY HEARTS can be contacted directly. They are real. Our clients and their testimonies are real. Can Jim’ say the same? The answer is definitely ‘No’.

Our comment: You be the 'judge'. However, the facts speak for themselves!

UNSATISFACTORY RESPONSE BY ‘JIM’! NO VERIFYABLE PROOF!

Our response: On the contrary ‘Jim’, it is you have proved nothing. We have exposed your corruption and made public the fact that you clearly fail to provide any solid evidence as to your identity and the slanderous accusations you make via your grotty and ignominious web site network. The facts are that your lack of verification warrants a full criminal police investigation into your seedy activities. Criminals like you need to be squashed and punished for your crimes. Justice will catch-up with you sooner or later. If we have any say in the matter, it will definitely be sooner.

Our comment: P.S. Don't be surprised if Jim tries to make more heated accusations against us as no crook or crooked company likes to have their dirty laundry aired in public. Jim and his backers are no different to any common criminal in this respect.

Our response: Well, as was to be expected, shortly after our criticism of Jim’s criminal antics hit the Internet, we were moved to his silly Black List. Thank you, ‘Jim’. You are nothing if not predictable. It remains another sterling example of ‘Jim’s’ gangster mentality i.e. resorting to slander, blacklisting and defamation against those who oppose ‘Jim’s’ criminal set-up. We won’t cow-tow to a scumbag racketeer like Jim. We will work to put Jim behind bars where he and his cohorts belong. Justice will catch-up with Jim and we want to be there with our cameras when they do. We certainly hope that female stooge from EM has her make-up in order when the shutters start clicking.

Our response: Your words are cheap, ‘Jim’. Show us the proof! (the truth is he can’t)

Our response: How can a call for justice be an admission of guilt? We are accountable, why aren’t you, ‘Scammerman’? Correction, ‘Jim’, we previously attempted to contact you as you well know and via your only avenue of contact i.e. email – and we were ignored. That was no surprise to us.

Our response: ‘Jim’, or whomever you are, your bogus ‘Black List’ is just as big a joke as the rest of your scam network. What we take seriously is the serious threat you constitute to an honest, open and lawful cyberspace. What we seek is an Internet that is devoid of sleazy criminals like you and all their associated criminal undertakings. Whilst a criminal cyber pimp like ‘Jim’ remains at large, civilized values are at risk of subjugated by smutty criminal enterprises like Jim’s Lists/agencyscams.net. We need to unite and expel these asinine cyber pimps like Jim and his cohorts from anywhere that decent, honest people wish to interact in with free trade that is devoid of corruption and criminal involvement.

Our response: On the contrary ‘Jim’, your site network is indeed a business, if it wasn’t and you didn’t feel so threatened, you would not have continued to slander us in an unjustified and negative way, you would have provided verifiable evidence as to your true identity. You would have posted the fact that our identity can be verified as can the positive testimonies of our clients and customers. You also wouldn’t resort to profanity and inane comments to try and discredit and criticize us. You would be able to formulate a constructive critique to articulate your thoughts and position. However, as you are obviously an uneducated thug, it is no wonder you resort to thuggish tactics like defamation, coercion, bullying and threats to maintain the momentum of your criminal enterprise.

Jim’s latest comments, dated April 2010, openly articulate in a rather blunt and coarse fashion (typical of ‘Jim’) the level of frustration that this cyber pimp is experiencing at the fact that HEAVENLY HEARTS will never be bullied or coerced by such an impotent cyber spectre as ‘Jim’ or his criminal tactics.

Jim’s Comments (the profanity has been censored for on-line publication): Malcolm, you're a A**HOLE and you are only hurting yourself with your actions. Punks like you have come and gone over the 10 years of running my site. It will be so nice to see you go. Later loser.

Our response: Taking a swing at us with nothing more than profanity only further serves to show that you have nothing to back-up your heated tirade against us, ‘Jim’. Your slanderous campaign is unfounded. We have verifiable proof and authentic evidence to validate our credentials and client testimonies. It’s a pity the same can’t be said for you, ‘Jim’.

We recommend that all those who are reading this and who advocate an Internet devoid of criminals such as Jim and his backers, do their utmost to boycott and discredit anyone associated with the entire Jim’s Lists scam. We recommend that everybody everywhere treats Jim’s slanderous unfounded accusations and web site propaganda for what it truly is – a concoction of unmitigated and fabricated lies. Avoid anyone promoted by Jim. Also, do everything possible to see that scum like Jim is brought to justice. His vilification is mandatory. Only by getting rid of the criminals like ‘Jim’ can the Internet become a place where people can interact in an unfettered, honest and acceptable fashion. If together we topple one corrupt cyber pimp like Jim, it won’t be difficult to topple the rest.